MQM goons a.k.a BhaiLog hijacked the SHC when suo moto inquiry about 12th May 2007 incident was supported to proceed. According to Dawn:

KARACHI, Sept 10: The Sindh High Court adjourned on Monday the suo motu inquiry into May 12 events for a week because of a massive gathering of workers of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement.

“The proceedings are being adjourned under compelling circumstances,” said a seven-member bench in a brief order after noting the request of lawyers appearing from the two sides.

Jang reports that several unidentified armed men were found in and around of SHC and police asusual acted like a silent spectator and did nothing:

So 10th September was the day when Judiciary was hijacked twice in Pakistan. First in the morning when Fedral govt kicked nawaz Sharif out and then later MQM goons repeated same in Karachi. It’s not clear whether MQM was following fedral govt or fedral govt followed MQM(Ref:12th May 2007).

But MQM’s vetran goon Kunwar Khalid Yunus denied such allegation and said that they as citizen came to hear the proceedings. Vetran goon further expressed typical Mullah phobia and said that this didn’t happen 1st time and in past mullahs’ friends from madraessahs used to do same when things went against them. Khalid couldn’t give a satisfactory answer when he was asked whether he was following alleged mullahs? I was quite amused after reading statement of Khalid. At one side his party condemn every religious party in Pakistan and declare them terrorist while on other hand they follow them.

MQM and Musharraf have been doing one mistake after other. It seems no sane and wise man has left in MQM which advise them that such tactics are proving them more guilty. Incase if MQM is banned, the goons will start another bloody movement in Karachi and will make us suffer more. On other hand, CJ is determined to give justice no matter what.

News Credits: The Jang and Daily Express

Technorati:Karachi,MQM,Pakistan

Mr.M.A. Jinnah wanted a secular state and we know it because he wished that on 11th August 1947 speech

You would have read/heard something similar lots of time in papers,TV programs or what not in wich secular participants tried to convince that Jinnah wanted a secular Pakistan rather an Islamic state. Before I move further,let me quote the famous ambiguous speech of Mr.Jinnah which labeled him a “Secular” .

You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State

This is the main part of his 11th August speech which to preach Secular Pakistan.

Before I move further on this topic that is Jinnah and his views, allow me to learn what’s actually Secularism or what actually is being promoted in the name of Secularism. From Online dictionary:

1. Religious skepticism or indifference.
2. The view that religious considerations should be excluded from civil affairs or public education.
3. A doctrine that rejects religion and religious considerations.

If you ask any secularist about his belief, He would just say, I just consider all religion equal. In order words secularist don’t give a damn to religion and don’t consider religion worthy enough that they give it primary importance. If you ask them, are you an atheist?, they get mad as well as got scared and say, No NO we are not atheist we are just seculars!!. I ask what’s the difference? I get no sensible answer. Let me give definition of atheism as well. From same source.

• Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
• The doctrine that there is no God or gods.
• Godlessness; immorality
• the doctrine or belief that there is no God

Find the difference? Athiest reject God while seculars reject religion as primary element of leading life. I ask, Isn’t a religion associated with a God or a Super force? take any Abrahmic faith(Islam,Judaism or Christianity) or Hinduism, they all talk about a super force which is called Allah in Islam, G-d/Yahweh in Judaism,God in Chritianity and Om in Hinduism. All mentioned religons talk about a Super force. When we talk about super force then we also believe that He was our creator thus He defined some rules and regulations to perform different functions of His universe and set some commands for His living creatures. The set of commands ,rules and regulations which have been prescribed by Super force is called religion. So by rejecting religion means we are rejecting God’s commandment? Then how could seculars claim that they don’t hate religion? In urdu the term used for Secularism is La-Deniyat, that is No-religion. If I remmeber right that La is an arabic term for No or to negate something. So Seculars also reject the existance of any religion in their surrounding which is not differant than rejecting a super force. Atleast Atheists are better than these seculars, atleast they are honest enough and don’t demonstrate hypocrisy by promoting secularism in the disguise of Secular <Religion> where Relgion=Islam,Christianity etc.

Ok, this was my opinion which you might like to reject, why not take a look what is being said by father(s) of secularism?

From about.com

The term secularism was created in 1846 by George Jacob Holyoake in order to describe “a form of opinion which concerns itself only with questions, the issues of which can be tested by the experience of this life(English Secularism, 60)

.

Charles Bradlaugh(1833-1891),the most powerful secularist of that time said in a public debate with Holyoake in 1870 said:

Although at present it may be perfectly true that all men who are Secularists are not Atheists, I put it that in my opinion the logical consequence of the acceptance of Secularism must be that the man gets to Atheism if he has brains enough to comprehend.

so If I want to summarize it, that’s the concept of Secularism is “all religion are equal”. So if we take a=Islam b=Christianity,c=Judaism and d=Hinduism then according to secular’s defintion:

a=b=c=d that is;
a=b=c=d=null, means “we don’t give a damn to any Religion”.

In short the term secularism is very vague and I don’t find any practical Implementation of so called Secularism or equality of religion. Talking about Sepration of Church and State and equating it with Islamic ideology is lame itself. If you read in detail about Sepration of Church and state movement then it was all started by American Athiests who were not Interested to bring their kids within a state religon which is not fair with non-Bible followers. If I was a bible follower, I could also second their thought because:

They entered into a covenant to seek the LORD, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul. All who would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether small or great, man or woman.(2 Chronicles 15:12-13 )

And if anyone still prophesies, his father and mother, to whom he was born, will say to him, ‘You must die, because you have told lies in the LORD’s name.’ When he prophesies, his own parents will stab him(Zechariah 13:3)

This is why they killed everyone who declared prophecy and they also killed Prophets like Zacriah(AS) and Jesus(AS)[as they claim]. Islam on other hand didn’t allow to kill any such false prophet or Apostate.

or when you are asked to follow this verse then it’s quite obvious that one would like the separation of such religion from state affairs. So demand of Separation of Church and state at that time was very fair. Since we have habit to get influenced easily with West so therefore we also wish to copy this thing as well. That’s other thing we only follow bad things of west rather good things.

These days ,three states in world are called countries who are big supporters of Secularism, America, India and Turkey. How much secular they are, I don’t need to explain you.

-India: is a Hindu dominated country where bigger minorities like Muslims are in trouble for long time. Babri Masjid destruction, Bombay/Gujrat Riots are just few examples of Indian Secularism.

-US: Eh, Mr. Bush, is it not enough to reject the idea of secularism in USA? USA is so SECULAR that they even promote In GOD WE TRUST. WHich God, they might not have idea but. umm.. Maybe Christian God or Jewish G-d?

-Turkey: The Vatican of seculars, what should I say about them? Read the related post about how Tolerent they are about their oponents.

I know I know I have gone enough beyond the topic but 1) this is not new 2) It was necessary 3) Aply both 1 &2.

So I am going to quote two different speeches of Mr. Jinnah about future state.

The Prophet of Islam (PBUH) was a great teacher. He was a great lawgiver. He was a great statesman and he was a great sovereign who ruled. The life of the Prophet (PBUH) was simple according to those times. He was successful in everything that he put his hand to from as a businessman to as a ruler. The Prophet (PBUH) was the greatest man that the world had ever seen. Thirteen hundred years ago he laid the foundations of democracy(occasion of the Holy Prophet’s birthday at the Karachi Bar Association on 25th January 1948)

What does it indicate? Was not Mr.Jinnah well equipped with biography of Muhammad(Saw). Was he not highly impressed with our most dearest Prophet(saw)? and why Not?? when non-muslims could admit the greatness of our Prophet(Saw) then Jinnah was still a Muslim.

On other occasion He said:

It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by our great lawgiver, the Prophet of Islam. Let us lay the foundations of our democracy on the basis of true Islamic ideals and principles(Civil, Naval, Military and Air Force Officers at Khaliqdina Hall Karachi on 11th October 1947)

Oh my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mr. Jinnah just burst the bubble of Secular Ideology!! What does he meant by “Golden Rules of Prophet(Saw)”? That was nothing but Sunnah of Rasool(saw) which Itself is based upon Quran and over all it’s called Islamic Shariah. SO Jinnah just wanted Islamic Shariah in Pakistan, which Shariah? not by Sunnis, not By shias no by somoe else but which is given according to Quran and Sunnah. This is also ordered by Allah and Rasool(saw) as well.

Is this speech not enough that How well equipped was Mr.Jinnah about Shariah and How much has he studied Quran? Shame on those people who criticized on his religious integration. If Jinnah was called Kafir-e-Azam(as seculars claim) then Seculars also called him a person with no knowledge about Islam. Retards of both sides deserve to be cursed heavily. The knowledge about Islam he had was more than our imagination. It’s also interesting to note that Jinanh was not a born religious man. He started studying Islam more when he got serious about separate Muslim nation. Lets for sake of argument we accept that Jinnah was religion hater in past, then, can’t he change his views? can’t he study about particular topic? why is he cursed for his past? All great companions(RA) were infidels before Islam. Is it sane and good to curse them due to their past life rather focusing on what they achieved later? Jinnah had studied Islam throughly that’s why came up with two classic speechs about His admiration for great Prophet(saw). On other pccasion Jinnah said:

What is it that keeps the Muslims united as one man, and what is the bedrock and sheet-anchor of the community. It is Islam. It is the Great Book, Quran, that is the sheet-anchor of Muslim India. I am sure that as we go on there will be more and more of oneness, one God, one Book, one Prophet and one Nation(All-India Muslim League, Karachi on 26th December 1943)

Another one:

Every Mussalman knows that the injunctions of the Holy Quran are not confined to religious and moral duties. From the Atlantic to the Ganges, says Gibbon, the Holy Quran is acknowledged as the fundamental code, not only of theology, but of civil and criminal jurisprudence, and the laws which regulate the action and the property of mankind are governed by immutable sanctions of the will of God”. Everyone, except those who are ignorant, knows the Holy Quran is the general code of the Muslims(message of Eid to the Muslims in September 1945)

Except those who are ignorants- JInnah closed the chapter of any future propaganda about his belief, about new state by giving these three speeches and called Ignorants to those who whine about Separation of Religion and State and want law other than Quranic. Ask from guys like HoodBhoy, Cowasjee and other pro secular movement about these speeches and ask them to use their brain to figure out what was actually Jinnah’s dream.

You ‘re free to go Temple,Church..- How the heck does it mean Secularism? as I said Jinnah had studies Islam then what Jinnah said, was it something against what Allah said in Quraan?

There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing(Quran 2:256)

in Urdu:

دین (اسلام) میں زبردستی نہیں ہے ہدایت (صاف طور پر ظاہر اور) گمراہی سے الگ ہو چکی ہے تو جو شخص بتوں سے اعتقاد نہ رکھے اور خدا پر ایمان لائے اس نے ایسی مضبوط رسی ہاتھ میں پکڑ لی ہے جو کبھی ٹوٹنے والی نہیں اور خدا (سب کچھ) سنتا اور (سب کچھ) جانتا ہے

Is it Not enough? If not then read the last aya of Surah Kafiron:

For you is your religion, and for me is my religion(109:6)

HOw Jinnah said something different than that when he said on 11th August?

When Omar Bin Khattab(RA) entered in Jerusalem which He(RA) conquered easily without any fight as it was a Biblical prophesy, Omar(RA) freed everyone to perform prayers according to his faith . When Moors ruled in Spain, they give equal protection to Jews and Christian and allow them to perform prayers according to their faith. Non-Muslims needed something like secularism because their Bible had no such thing of equal status neither there was such thing within Hinduism. Islam gave equal rights to non-muslims as well. Why do we muslims see something foreign when everything is mentioned in Islam? Does that not mean that those who reject the supremacy of Islam are ignorant and blind enough that they never studied Quran properly?

So what actually these seculars and liberals want in Pakistan? Jinnah’s dream? which dream? Islamic state, Offcourse not, they don’t want such thing. then what? Well.. what I think that they want to implement their own filthy “religion” in the name of Jinnah. What Jinnah wanted , I mentioned by quoting his speech. His speech of 11th August doesn’t reflect that He was a religion hater. His 11th august speech is according to Quranic Verses and according to government of Omar(RA) in Jerusalem.

Those who blame Jinnah as a secularist are those who always confuse about their own identity. I remember while reading an article by Cowasjee an year back, he mentioned that he met Salahuddin ,”Sallu”(Haveli Fame), Sallu got disturbed when he found the urdu meaning of secularism as Ladeniyat and tried to seek some term which don’t reflect seculars as Atheists. It brought on my face that How confused these seculars are.

People would keep blaming Jinnah for their own interest but what actually was Jinnah could be learnt from his speeches. When people could blame Muslims as followers of Mod God then how could they forgive Jinnah and labeling him as Secularist? Pakistan and Israel are two states which are based on religion. Pakistan was established on 27th Ramadan. How could Pakistan be a non-religious state which was described by Iqbal as:

Meer-e-Arab ko aaee thandi hawa jahan se,
Mera watan wohi hai, mera watan wohi hai.
(From where the Prophet Mohammed(saw) received a cool breeze,
That is my motherland, that is my motherland.)

which is based on Hadith of Rasool(SAw) in which He(saw) said that He feels attraction towards Hind- Why did Prophet(saw) attraction? These are few things which force to Ponder about creation of Pakistan for specific purpose. What Specific purpose? it was nothing but leading life according to Islam which Jinnah wished and spread Islam all over. Today Pakistan is the only country which is center of spreading Islam all over the world via various form of Tableegh. Pakistanis are busy in spreading message of Allah everywhere in world even in Israel. How such state could be established on basis of secularism? Nobody could give any sensible answer yet, even seculars. If Jinnah just wanted a secular state then why the heck did he get a separate state at first palace? was India not enough to provide security to Hindus or seculars believed Gandhi and Nehru impotent enough that they wasn’t able to guard their own fellows? If you ask seculars about then, they would start discussing everything but will not give you proper answer.

May Allah fulfill the dream of Jinnah which He saw as an Islamic Pakistan which follow the teachings of His admirer and our Prophet(saw).- Ameen

Yeh Laal Rang Kab Mujhe Chorey Ga

zulm phir zulm hai, baDtaa hai to miT jaataa hai
khoon phir khoon hai, Tapkegaa to jam jaayegaa

zulm ki baat hi kyaa, zulm ki auqaat hi kyaa
zulm bas zulm hai, aagaaz se anjaam talak

khoon phir khoon hai, sau shaql badal saktaa hai
aesee shaqleN ke miTaao to miTaaye na bane
aese sholay ke bujhaao to bujhaaye na bane
aese naaray ke dabaao to dabaaye na bane!

Read Orya Maqbool Jan’s article. He’s not saying something different.

Image Credit: The Daily Express

Today Javeria contacted me via Meebo chat interface on my blog and asked me to provide the link of Director’s statement which I discussed earlier in this post. I just told her that it was in main page but she didn’t find. I visited Khuda K Liye’s official site after making my last post about the topic and got surprised to know that there was no link at all! first I didn’t believe at all and thought that some changes have rearranged the link but found out that link was not there anymore. I had no clue to give her. I knew I did mention it on my previous post, the statement which was the base of my entire post rather the MOVIE. I knew that like her, other users would also come to me and ask the proof whether there was such statement by him or I made it up against him just because I don’t like him anymore? I also referred the statement of Jang but that couldn’t be considered credible and I knew that Pro Shoaib or I say Pro secular and liberal groups would come to me and accuse me that I made up myself since there is no such proof on website. I didn’t take the screen shot as I didn’t consider necessary neither I had expected that DIRECOT’s STATMENT could be changed! yes changed *grin*. Shoaib’s statement was really extreme and it really got proved when the site removed the link of his statement and comeup with another link ,named SYNOPSIS in which they just targeted 9/11 issue which was the REAL content of the movie which was polluted later after Junaid’s decision to quit the movie. What Synopsis says? read now:

I again paste the excerpt of his statement which I referred earlier as well:

One morning i was going through a newspaper and i saw my friend junaid jamshed’s interview in it. After looking at his new attire in the photograph that ace the article published in it. I could not stop myself from reading it. The more i read the more sad i felt. He had announced quiting music after being convinced that it was “haram”. It really shook me very badly. I have never believed that God could hate the two most beautiful things he has given to mankind…. Music and painting.why are these the two most beautiful things i felt that a confused man like junaid had no right to confuse thousands of his youthful followers. I had given him sixteen years of my life as a true friend and had played my role in his professional life to the best of my abilities. How could he throw away our sixteen years just like that without even consulting me? I felt that it was my duty to rectify the damage he had done to the already suffering society under the influence of fundamentalists. I thought that the need of the hour was to study the whole mindset which gave birth to such wrong notions about islam. I have no doubt in my mind that instead of taking the present age fourteen hundred years back we have to bring islam to the present age. The best service to islam today is to make it applicable to modern day requirements

The mentioned para was directly hitting Junaid Jamshed, also explains the motive of the movie. His extreme statement was not only disliked by me but many other fans as well. Even Junaid himself reacted when he was asked about the movie. I am just amazed that Junaid is still praising Shoaib. Atleast I couldn’t demonstrate so much patience or maybe I have not gone thru the process like him? Shoaib didn’t ask the money but how Shoaib returned everything is visible to entire world in form of Khuda K liye. tsk tsk.

Now I would like to tell how this evening I discovered the “hidden” link. Ever heard in urdu, Chor hamesha koi saboot chor jata hay? something like that happened this evening. When a lame mistake of Webmaster helped me to find out orignal link. Read below the entire masti bhari exercise!

Khair, I had no proof to tell others. I know a blog entry is not worthy enough to be told. I tried to search google cache but I couldn’t find the link because site was in Flash. I also didn’t know file name at all because main Flash movie name was in_the_name_of_god.swf. I actually have ZERO idea about flash thingie coz I am not a designer. I am rather a programmer and architect. I downloaded Teleport Pro,the offline browser but it also didn’t grab ALL the files since such grabbers work only after parsing URL links from page and the process recursively unless the condition gets true. The link was not given in any HTML file so offline tool got failed as well. My FireFox cache was also cleaned few days back. Once a friend of mine who is a good designer told me about Flash decompilers. I thought to give it a try. I applied reverse engineering, decompiled the main SWF file and went thru all objects. I found nothing, only images,buttons and frames. Then there was a tree node about scripts. I opened that and went thru each file. One of the file had an ActionScript command to navigate pages in Flash. And see what I found.Click the image to see the clear Image.

yep! I had found the actual FLASH file name which was embedded in the main SWF file. Now I tried to access the mentioned link and what I found? The culprit which was hidden by the webmaster. Since I am sure that it would be removed later therefore I made a copy of it and uploaded on a free server. If you run the file directly, something like that would appear on your browser. Click for enlarge view.

Enough Said! Before I say anything why it was done, I would like to comment on the “efficieny” of Webmaster. Was it me who was extraordinary smart or the webmaster was extraordinary dumb? Being a Pakistani IT person,specially a developer, I would go for second part because this is the most common and core weakness of developers,specially web developers that they always leave the old copies of their on production server. Even I have done it many times but I just realized today that How insecure and harmful it is! this is just about a movie. Sometimes we developers leave sensitive or vulnerable code files on production servers or just rename them by adding _ or 1 or 2 as prefix or suffix. Even I also tried that to find file name on main server of movie but my manual brute force technique didn’t work at all :-). So young developers or even seniors who have been reading this blog should learn a lesson and never leave a copy online on production server. There is nothing hidden in web world. Now the question is, why did he do that?? Was shoaib regretting or he realized that He really spoke TOO Much against Junaid and acted like an extremist which he himself dislike? Or was he afraid that people would start thinking negative about him or something else? I don’t want to give my own statement, I leave it upto you. Whatever I had to say about the statement I already mentioned on the related post. Just would like to add something which is said in Urdu, “Chor k Darhee mey Tinka”. Since Shoaib dislike Darhee and considers it a hurdle in progressive life, I would rather make it as Chor k kaan mey Tinka . :-). Jab Pyar kia tu darna kiya! When you think that you are on RIGHT path then why are you backing up? Truth is stronger and you are claiming that Ye film aap ko sochney par Majboor kardey gi. What ShoMAn wants us to think, you can read this article on Adil Najam’s blog, the agenda of US neocons and Jewish Lobby desi Liberals and seculars. Who knows they even change the SyNOPSIS link, I got a mirror copy of it as well. So enjoy this entire “TRUE” campaign by Shoaib Mansoor and Co.

 

Why did I do all this? Well I already explained it plus it was an interesting evening hack, short but useful. I also learnt how to decompile Flash movies and export objects from it. :-). A masti Bhari Exercise

 

Click All images to view Enlarge version

 

Oh last but not least, the credit goes to Javeria who informed me about this *broken link* and gave me an excuse to write this blog entry as well as got chance to do an interesting evening hack about Flash and reverse engineering. Thanks! :>

 

Related Post: Fantaism inthe name of God

 

I came across an interesting piece of video about Reza Shah Pehalvi, former Iranian Kind in which “HE” condemning jewish lobby. This is something interesting for me because what Shah did in Iran to bring secularism or religiousness is not hidden at all. Anyway, watch this video.

Last june when I wrote this article after seeing this picture, I had no idea that one day my own little Pakistanis would suffer like that. I wish I wouldn’t have read this article by shahid masood which bruoght tears in my eyes. I felt that it happened with my own daughter.

We would keep arguing this operation was right or wrong, we would keep blaming both right and left wing fundamentalists but I ask same question today which I asked zionists an year back and today I am asking my own muslims fellows, What was her fault?

Was this little asma a threat for your homes and family? did little asma tarnish the _KIGDOM_ of the dictator?

We can’t blame mush for this neither we can blame ghazis for her killing. The real murderer are you and me who always prefer to hide in bins and never raise voice against injustice. Don’t think this can’t happen with you. Always remember that there is a little asma in our homes as well. What if this happen with her? Also, when Allah will ask you what you did to save this little creature then what would you answer? Just ponder once!

Technorati tags: Pakistan, Musharraf, Extremism, Secularism, Masjid, Islam, Mosque, Jamia Hafsa, politics

16 corore Insanoo
Zindagi se Begano

Ye Milain yeh Jaageerain
Kis ka Khoon peeti hain?

Berekoun mey Ye Fojain
Kis k Paisoun per Palti Hain?

Bolney per pabandi
Sochney per Taazerain

Paun me ghulaami ki, aaj bhee hain Zanjeerain
Aaj hurf-e-Akhir hay,bat chand logoun ki

Uth k Dard Mando key,Subha Shaam Badlo bhe

Dostoun ko pehchano, Dushmano ko Pehchano
16 Corore Insanoo..

via SMS

As everyone was expecting, According to today’s DAWN:

Ten people, six of them children, were killed while hundreds of others received multiple injuries on Sunday as Lahorites celebrated Basant, ignoring official calls for responsible kite-flying.

Eleven-year-old Umer Farooq was killed in Gulshan-i-Ravi when the string of a stray kite slit his throat.

Farooq’s relatives and people of the area wanted to lodge a murder case against the Punjab government. On police refusal, they held a demonstration and raised slogans against the chief minister and the district nazim for allowing kite-flying.

They should!!

Who cares if 6 kids died, after all, changes demand sacrifices No? We have to donate our kids and people in the name of secularism,enilightment and moderation and “soft image”. So what If govt don’t give a damn to order given by supreme court. Supreme court is run by some bloody backward Mullahs who don’t even know that we have been taking steps for Progressive Pakistan,we will do ANYTHING to promote SOFTIMAGE whether it demands beating a kid who demands the release of his kid or banning people to offer prayer to save our real friend Tony Blair abd then say Sorry.

I wonder how our hard liner local secularist,enlightened and moderated class would react on this incident who have been busy here to condemn Islam or Mullah by every mean. Maybe they ignore it and don’t pay attention since it’s not “offending” their ideology? Anyways, we have to sacrifice more and more people in future, whether it’s in name of religion or anti-religion. *sigh*

Image Credit: The Daily Express

Tagged:extreemism,pakistan,secularism,culture

A 12-year-old Muslim girl today lost her High Court challenge to her school’s ban on wearing the niqab full-face veil

The golden rule of secularism:

The veil covers all of the face except the eyes. About 120 of the school’s 1,300-plus pupils are Muslims, and up to 60 of them wear the hijab headscarf.

And then these Muslims liberals innocently insist We are not extreemist.

On a related note,another example of freedom and equal rights.