Who is victorious?

This picture published in today’s Jang. I don’t know what to say. Both parties claiming to be victorious. Who’s victorious, I don’t know at all. All I know that both are losers. Both lost their loved ones, both lost their fellow muslims. *sigh*





Bookmark at:

Digg It!

5 Responses to “Who is victorious?”

  1. fara Says:

    and its also not decided yet that was it a war or jihad or political drama or to make Mushraf a GREAT RAHNUMA forever???

  2. Ahmed Shaikh Memon Says:

    Those who practice Islam, clearly understand that those who follow Allah’s path without any fear and with deep believe, never afraid of winning or loosing the world.

    And those brother and sisters, who do not read Quran, do not involve in any lecture based on Quran or Ahadis, believe that both parties are crap.

    My request is that do not waste your precious time on being Judge. Just practise Islam and focus on your relation with Allah thats it. This is what your success.

    The time waste on judging will not be fruitfull for this or that world. However, if we make any statement due to our limited vision, we might get into the grip of Allah.

    Allah Subhana o’ ta’ala hum sab pe reham farmai. Ameen.

  3. rashidlatif Says:

    In Qura’an it is written that MOhammad(PBUH) was asked to lead and pray in masjid e zarrar. Wahee revealed that the only reason mosque was built was to create prejudice(inteshaar)against muslims and that Moahmmad(PBUH) should destroy masjid e zarrar. And so it was done…
    Nowadays all the mosques in the world are practicing prejudice against each other. Are they not similar to Masjid e zarrar?

  4. admin Says:

    first of all you didn’t read the entire masjid zarar issue, did you?

    Second, you said “ALL mosques” in the world following same. Did you visit ALL mosques in the world? keep in mind that there are millions of mosque in the world.

    2 months back a teacher was caught palgarising the content from other sources, now should I start blame entire professors community due to one person?

    Think logically my friend. I am sure you are mature enough that you can comprehend things.

    Speaking of masjid zarar, prophet(saw), the action was taken by Prophet(Saw), here party is musharraf who are chor,enemies of Islam,women abusers, How could such perso be compared with the Prophet(Saw)?

    -Second masjid zarar was NOT made by muslims,it was made by jews who never became muslim, you can’t compare jews with Muslims. Allah crearly distinguised between muslims,hypocrites and idol worshipers. By definition, no muslim is MUNAFIQ or Mushrik, even I dislike Musahrraf, I can’t call him a non-muslim because He belives in Kalima, people who built masjid never believed in One God and Kalima.

    Alas, you did remember masjid zarar issue which I know heared from someone else rather trying to find out in Quran but you NEVER got chance to read hadith in which Rasool(Saw) clearly instructs to stop evil either by hand or toungue or consider it bad inside and this is the lowest level of imaan

    P.s: Sorry for lots of typos.
    P.P.S Ignorance shoudn’t be an excuse. When non-muslims can read Quran and find truth then why not you?

  5. Fahad Says:

    I am not a strict hater of Musharraf neither I am against religious leaders who was to practice Islam and preach Islam PEACEFULLY. It’s when both Musharraf and our preachers (mullahs, imams and all) turn violent. Don’t get me wrong but I think it’s better for these preachers to stay peaceful because people like Musharraf are bound to be violent by their very nature and most of all job description (not as an army officer but as a dictator).
    Second we should not let our sentiments decide whether those two brothers in Lal Masjid were right or wrong. If there are people who believe that the Musharraf government should have resolved the conflict through dialogue, then I think the same should apply to the Aziz Brothers too. I disagree with their argument that the world wasn’t listening to us and that’s why we captured the children’s library building and had assailed CD shops and alleged brothels. The media in Pakistan is quite liberal now a days and would have listened to their voices if they had done so. Some people might say that they had been communicating their grievances for a long time (and by long time I mean a couple of months r about an year or two) but then they had to turn violent in the face of the governments’ indifference, my response to that is that may be they should have tried a little more. If they were willing to sacrifice their lives, why not do so in a peaceful manner. A peaceful protest would have been helpful in winning the hears of the general public as well.

Say something