I came across a fine piece of report few months back when Pakistan Govt Army decided to crackdown against militant movements and sardars of Balochistan but I missed this link and had been trying to find it since that day. The Urdu version of same report published in Ummat during same month but I couldn’t capture it as well. Today this report was discussed in Jang and I found the keyword which could lead me to the actual source. I don’t know this news is new for you or not. This is also not up-to-date but more relevant than any latest news.

This is a courageous attempt by a five men army. Tariq Saeedi in Ashgabat, Sergi Pyatakov in Moscow, Ali Nasimzadeh in Zahidan, Qasim Jan in Kandahar and S M Kasi in Quetta. They were supported by reports, Rupa in Delhi and Mark from Washington D.C.

This report is comprised of two parts and due to its length I can’t quote word by word but would definitely share critical excerpts of the report. How this report appears different than others because it is based on information provided by two ex-members of KGB who are considered masterminds of BLA (Balochistan Liberation Army).From the report:

In the wake of 9-11, when the United States came rushing to Afghanistan with little preparation and less insight, the need was felt immediately to create sources of information and action that should be independent of the government of Pakistan. As Bush peered into the soul of Putin and found him a good guy, Rumsfeld also did his own peering into the soul of his Russian counterpart and found him a good game. The result was extensive and generous consultation by Russian veterans who knew more about Afghanistan and Balochistan than the Americans could hope to find.

Report further reveals:

“When we first started the BLA thing, it was logical to ask for RAW assistance because they have several thousands of ground contacts in Pakistan, many of them in Balochistan,” said Sasha.

“Anyone wanting to set shop in Pakistan needs to lean on RAW,” added Misha.

Question: What was the purpose of Russian invasion of Afghanistan?

Misha: The Soviet Union was not in love with Afghanistan itself and by now everyone must have understood it. We, or at least our leaders, wanted a convenient corridor to the warm waters of the Indian Ocean — the idea was to first establish full control in Kabul and from there to raise the double-bogey of Pakhtunistan and Greater Balochistan and try to detach at least a part of Balochistan from Pakistan and to either merge it as a new province of Afghanistan or to create a new country that should be under the firm control of Moscow. That would have solved most of the problems facing Kremlin.


As I mentioned above that this report is not so up-to-date but the maps of greater Balochistan are not secret anymore.

Question: Who could have revived BLA after so many years of inactivity?

Misha: Most likely, Pentagon. With good lot of support from Kremlin. You should keep in mind that reviving such an organization is a tricky task and it needs active support from a number of players. Pentagon and Kremlin would not be able to do much without some help from RAW that has hundreds of active contacts all over Balochistan. Russia could have helped negotiate the involvement of Balach Marri in the project.

Qeustion:….could you give us any coherent reasons for going to such great lengths for disturbing Pakistan that is supposed to be a frontline ally of the United States on its war against terrorism?

Misha and Sasha: [Misha laughed so hard that tears came to his eyes while Sasha merely kept smiling in an absentminded way] – Frontline ally? Are you kidding? Americans are using Pakistan and Pakistanis would soon find it out if they have not already. Americans don’t need that kind of allies and they have made it abundantly clear for anyone who can read their policy goals correctly. Let them deal with Iran and you would see. If there can be any desirable American ally in that region, that is Iran – Iran under a different regime, and they are working to that end. Except for Balochistan, the rest of Pakistan is useless for them.

Sounds shocking? Yes it does but it would not be shocking for those who even know a little bit about policies of neocons for fulfilling of their interests. I would definitely like my readers to spend few times in front of PC and watch this awesome documentary by Adam Curtis which is banned in United States. It would definitely help you to know the background of USSR war and the tactics used by Neocons to defeat communism by introducing Osama Bin Laden and later Al-Qaeda to penetrate further in Mideast region.

There is no doubt that Americans use Pakistani rulers for sake of their interest. In fact they use every other source which is handy for their ‘cause’. OBL (Osama Bin Laden) might be sweetheart of many emotional Muslims who get excited after watching him on TV but for me He is yet another Lawrence of Arabia for the Muslim world. Iran is not a surprising factor at all. They have good relations with India than Pakistan.IMHO or as I got chance to chat with few Iranians online, they consider Pakistan a Sunni state so naturally it does create a negative factor against Pakistan. This is just my speculation and I have no intention to be anti-Shia in this post neither I am but since I am sharing what I experienced so I wouldn’t lie. At least India-Iran relationship is not a secret at all. By the way they do tell the reasons which could make Iran against us.

Report says further

Misha: Moreover, you cannot ignore the fact that India is preparing to use Afghanistan as its main artery system to connect with Central Asia and it would not allow Pakistan to share this sphere if it can.

Again India-Afghan relationship is clear to us. Afghans are in love with Aishwarya and Shahrukh Khan just like Karzai is in love with MMH and Sonia Gandhi. India is constantly supplying all kind of services to Afghanistan and Afghanistan in return keeps biting us by labeling us terrorism supporter.

Question: What about Iran? Why should Iran be a party to it?

Misha: Iran has incurred great expenses to develop Chah Bahar, the port that is supposed to be the Iranian answer to Pakistani ports of Gawadar and Pasni. Iran has also done lot of work to create excellent road link between Herat and Chah Bahar. All this would go to waste if Pakistani route comes on line because it is shorter and offers quick commuting possibilities between Central Asia and Indian Ocean.’

Question: The way the things are progressing in Balochistan, what could be the likely outcome?

Misha: If no strong action is taken for another few months, the result could be bifurcation of Pakistan (God forbid).

BTW, that God forbid was added by me not by ex-KGB guys. They are not used to of anything related with God *grin*.

Now the Important step which Pakistan has now taken seriously.

Question: Hypothetically speaking, if the Pakistan government asked your advice, what would you suggest?

Sasha: The options are few. They should abolish Serdari system immediately and crack down powerfully on the private armies. As far as I know, the constitution of Pakistan does not allow Serdari system and private armies and there would be no legal questions if those laws are implemented with the full help of state power.

Source: Mystery of Balochistan Insurgency - Part One Mystery of Balochistan Insurgency - Part Two

Since this conspiracy is giving benefit to every party, I have come up with a relationship map between mentioned countries to figure out who would be most beneficial with this plan.

• US-Iran[appears bad but not according to this report]
• US-India [very good]
• US-Russia [could be ally upon request]
• Russia-India[excellent]
• Russia-Iran[good]
• US-Afghanistan[good]
• Russia-Afghanistan[not good]
• India-Afghanistan[good]
• India-China[getting better; Pakistan appears as an obstacle]
• Us-China[ummm not Good]
• Russia-China[old friends]
• Iran-China[good working relationship]
• Iran-India[very good]

Now what is the most common factor among 13 relationship maps? Off course India which has good relationship with every involved country. India doesn’t appear to gain a big share initially but on the long run India would be very successful.

Now what about poor Pakistan? Well what should I say? Only China is the country which still tolerating us I don’t know why otherwise neither Iran is ours nor whole Middle East. Forget USA, we are already under their paws. The saddest part of the story is that Pakistani policy makers doesn’t understand all this or they are smart enough that they even know but for them power is more Important than a country. The thing which irks more that our educated class which has earned education from good local and foreign institutes and many of them have spent lives in US,UK and other regions also become naïve about US-Pakistan relationship and foreign influence. This is very pathetic situation especially when things are getting out of control; we are still fighting with each other about Kalabagh dam, Punjabism influence over other provinces, Musharraf’s Wardi, Hudood Ordinance etc.

Twitter This

User Name: Password:

Bookmark at:

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 13th, 2006 at 8:32 pm and is filed under Everything . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.